Leaders in Health Authority Engagement
Across an entire development program, most sponsors spend fewer than ten hours in formal dialogue with the agency. Those hours decide trial designs, endpoints, and approval pathways worth years of runway. We prepare your team for every health authority interaction: choosing the right meeting at the right time, asking questions the agency can actually answer, and converting preliminary feedback into binding alignment you can build a program on.
We support the full lifecycle of a health authority interaction: deciding whether to meet, securing the meeting, preparing the room, and holding the agency to what was agreed.
Choosing the right interaction (INTERACT, Type A, B, C, D, or Q-Sub) at the right development milestone, and knowing when not to meet at all.
Meeting requests that get granted, questions the agency can answer, and briefing packages that frame the discussion before it starts.
Full-dress rehearsals with former FDA reviewers playing the agency side, so the hardest questions get asked before meeting day.
Senior leads in the room (or on the line) to facilitate, keep discussion on your questions, and read agency signals in real time.
Sponsor minutes, discrepancy resolution against official FDA minutes, and action plans that convert feedback into program decisions.
EMA scientific advice, MHRA, PMDA, Health Canada, and TGA interactions, coordinated so regional feedback builds one coherent global strategy.
Requesting the wrong meeting type wastes a review cycle. Requesting it too early wastes the meeting itself. We map every planned agency interaction against your development milestones, then build each request around questions the division can actually commit to: specific, answerable, and sequenced so that one meeting's outcome sets up the next.
By the time you enter the room, FDA has already formed its positions from your briefing package. A strong package frames each issue, presents the data honestly, and proposes a position the division can agree with in writing. We author and pressure-test the entire dossier: the meeting request, the question set, the background sections, and your planned responses to the preliminary comments that arrive days before the meeting.
Teams rarely lose meetings on the science. They lose them on an unrehearsed answer, a contradiction between two presenters, or a concession made under pressure. We run full-dress mock meetings with former FDA reviewers on the agency side of the table, assign roles, script the first sixty seconds of every answer, and drill the questions your team hopes nobody asks.
The meeting itself moves fast: an hour, sometimes less, with preliminary comments arriving only days before. Our senior consultants join your team at the table to facilitate the discussion, keep the agency on your question list, flag when a reviewer comment is an opening rather than an objection, and advise in real time on what to concede, what to defend, and what to take away for follow-up.
Official FDA minutes are the binding record, and they do not always match the room. We draft sponsor minutes within hours of the meeting, reconcile them line by line against the agency's official version, and pursue corrections where the record misstates an agreement. Then we turn the outcome into an action plan: what changes in the protocol, the CMC plan, and the submission timeline, and what gets confirmed in writing before you spend against it.
Advice from one agency can quietly contradict another: an endpoint EMA accepts that FDA questions, a comparator PMDA expects that nobody else does. We plan and execute interactions across the major health authorities as a single campaign, sequencing national scientific advice so each response strengthens your position with the next agency instead of fragmenting your development plan.
Two situations demand more than standard meeting preparation: a public Advisory Committee vote, and a program where sponsor and agency no longer agree.
An Advisory Committee meeting is part science, part theater, and entirely unforgiving. We manage the full preparation campaign: core presentation development, panelist background analysis, mock panels with voting, rapid-response slide libraries for the Q&A, and speaker coaching for a televised, adversarial setting.
Clinical holds, refuse-to-file letters, Complete Responses, and unresolvable division-level disagreements each have a formal path forward, and an informal one that is often faster. We help sponsors decide when to push, when to reframe, and when to escalate through Formal Dispute Resolution, then run the interaction that follows.
Our meeting teams are built from former FDA reviewers who once wrote the preliminary comments you're responding to, and industry regulatory leaders who have run hundreds of agency interactions as sponsors. You get the senior practitioner in the room, not a junior team under a partner's name.
Consultants who have drafted agency meeting minutes, briefed division directors, and voted in internal pre-meeting caucuses. They know how your package is read because they used to read them.
Meeting strategy is division-specific. We track how individual review divisions handle endpoints, accelerated pathways, and advice requests, and prepare you for the division you actually have.
Practitioners with direct working experience at and with EMA, MHRA, PMDA, and Health Canada, so multi-region advice comes from people who have run those procedures.
Small molecule, biologic, cell & gene, device, diagnostic, and digital health programs across oncology, rare disease, neuroscience, immunology, and beyond.
Tell us which interaction is ahead of you and where the program stands. We'll match you with a senior meeting lead and respond within one business day. All inquiries are strictly confidential.
Our team's perspectives on FDA meetings, health authority strategy, and what actually happens inside the review division: coming soon. In the meantime, reach out directly with a question you'd like to see addressed.
Why most meeting questions get non-answers, and how to structure ones that don't.
When the newest meeting formats beat waiting for a Type B slot.
When joint advice accelerates a global program, and when it backfires.